Regulation s offshore: Holder Eligibility Regimes

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

3 of the 18 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 15 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 0 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source for each breakdown it prices, in EUR (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences for one breakdown), so a page that gives figures for several breakdowns gives one for each and N counts 4 figures, never sentences; 30 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): one row per jurisdiction per investor class: the threshold and the test quoted verbatim from the authority with the date read, beside the fund or token regime a tokenized product is issued under there (Reg D/Reg S and 3(c)(7) in the US, the Prospectus Regulation's qualified investor in the EU, COBS 3.5 in the UK, the MAS accredited-investor opt-in in Singapore, CIMA's registered fund in Cayman, the BVI professional fund, Liechtenstein's TVTG, the Swiss DLT Act).

The derivation is the CROSS-JURISDICTION comparison joined to the register: which tokens a person in this jurisdiction may hold, and which threshold decides it.

30 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.